Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:57570 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122Ab2AWQg6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:36:58 -0500 Received: by pbaa10 with SMTP id a10so1707683pba.19 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:36:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F1D84CE.8020403@maya.org> References: <4EFF12D9.3010602@01019freenet.de> <2766356.70ylY68Gqi@helmutmobil.site> <4F040FEA.3080703@01019freenet.de> <1408490.qSFZVkU7fA@helmutmobil.site> <4F0562DF.3000200@dualc.maya.org> <4F0AEBAB.9020104@01019freenet.de> <201201100803.q0A83nsQ003757@mail.maya.org> <201201200730.q0K7U0oj004966@mail.maya.org> <4F1D84CE.8020403@maya.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:36:57 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20120123_173702_480412_7EDC9710) Subject: Re: Compat-wireless-3.2-rc6-3 is broken for rt2860 device From: Helmut Schaa To: Andreas Hartmann Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Felix Fietkau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Helmut Schaa schrieb: >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Andreas Hartmann >> wrote: >>> All in one: Your workaround was a good idea, but unfortunately it >>> doesn't "solve" / workaround the problem introduced with the patch >>> "mac80211: retry sending failed BAR frames later instead of tearing >>> down aggr" [1]. I don't know off any other solution at this time as to revert it. >> >> Ok, so we've got at least one hw issue here: rt2800 is not able to report >> correct ACK state of BARs :( >> >> The interesting bit is that the legacy drivers tear the BA session down as >> soon as the first AMPDU subframe failed. That's the same behavior as >> mac80211 had before the mentioned patch. >> >> So, let's assume the generic way Felix implemented works for other devices >> (like ath9k) we could go with a workaround inside rt2x00 to tear down >> the BA session as soon as the first AMPDU frame failed. >> >> Mind to try that one (not even compile tested though :) ). > > hdr is missing. I tried to derive it like this: > > struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr=(void*)entry->skb->data; Looks correct but you should put it right before the ieee80211_is_data_qos check not at the start of the function ... Also you might want to add " tx_info->control.sta != NULL" check in the same if clause. Helmut