Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:54282 "EHLO
	mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753601Ab2A3PId (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:08:33 -0500
Received: by werb13 with SMTP id b13so3536021wer.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:08:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1327935323.3630.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
References: <CAG-2HqUqwHo_xgqC79riQF2DA4DPz1Qy5ZARQK8GT+tf_-UKRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1327935323.3630.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
From: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:08:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG-2HqXikXhCighRnc8ovEB0YJm=0DRgxAcyBDnFpQw_vRGcww@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20120130_160838_764486_18F47034)
Subject: Re: status of ipw2x00
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Johannes,

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> Yes, it's unfortunate but true -- ipw 2200 and the current 2200 devices
> are completely different hardware, there's no overlap.

Thanks for the clarification.

Tom