Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:33175 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755502Ab2AIHad convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:30:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:00:32 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20120109_083049_601969_BFE9E18D) Subject: Re: ath9k crash 3.2-rc7 From: Mohammed Shafi To: MR Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Rajkumar Manoharan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2012/1/9 MR : > > ?> > Around 23 hours have elapsed. > ?> > > ?>> WiFi seems to be working 100% of time. It is always at least lightly > ?>loaded. > > 45h - all OK. > > ?> great and thanks a lot for testing! > > Doesn't really require _doing_ anything except building patched kernels. And > it is in my best interest to test the driver for the WiFi card I use... > > ?> rather than removing the suspicious code > ?> this is properly fixed by us with this patch. > ?> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132595161516806&w=2 > > Ah, I saw the message and wondered whether it is the fix I needed and what > patches should I apply. > > So, I am building 3.2 with two patches: over/under-flow catcher (pity that > it seems to be on a multiple-times-per-second codepath and just leaving the > checks there for everyone is suboptimal) and allegedely proper fix. Both > applied OK with a small offset. as per our assumption, we should not see those over/underflow errors, with the patch above mentioned. please let us know if you hit upon this warnings, even after the proper fix. > > > -- shafi