Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34487 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753421Ab2BINFG (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:05:06 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RvTgN-0006Oe-8y for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:05:03 +0100 Received: from 94.101.220.23 ([94.101.220.23]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:05:03 +0100 Received: from larsbro by 94.101.220.23 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:05:03 +0100 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Lars Bro Subject: mac80211 fixed rate packet injection Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: (sfid-20120209_140511_793306_D39ED615) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, At Jan 20, Sam Leffler posted a patch for enabeling packet injection with the rate specified in the radiotap message. Did this ever make its way to the release, or was it rejected. I am investigating the feasibility of using such a function for train-wayside communication where it is more important that all wayside radios that receive a message forward it to the central. This use case does not comply with the association-disassociation scheme, as this is one-to-one. Lars Bro