Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:41092 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267Ab2BMNp4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:45:56 -0500 Received: by pbcun15 with SMTP id un15so4560345pbc.19 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:45:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F390ED3.8010400@openwrt.org> References: <4F390ED3.8010400@openwrt.org> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:45:56 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20120213_144600_351887_4E76CC09) Subject: Re: Poor RT2880 performance From: Helmut Schaa To: Florian Fainelli Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, gwingerde@gmail.com, Ivo Van Doorn , Andreas Hartmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > I am playing with a RT2880-F based AP, with a N connected station, in a > residential environment. Mind to provide the RF and RT chipset identifications? rt2x00 should print them out during module load (at least when compiled with debugging options). > I could not get more than 26Mbits/sec TCP performance using iperf on both > sides, Did aggregation kick in? What rate was selected by the AP? > changing to a busier channel even made the performance drop down to > 5Mbits/sec, and remained like this. Andreas also reported some issues as soon as the environment gets noisy, not sure what the root cause for this is :( Helmut