Return-path: Received: from mms1.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.17]:3315 "EHLO mms1.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756592Ab2BNKHa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:07:30 -0500 From: "Arend Van Spriel" To: "Saul St. John" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" cc: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3_Mi=B3ecki?= Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:07:13 -0800 Subject: RE: [RFC] use alternate SPROM offset for 43224 Message-ID: <400C43189542CE41BC0A5B252FC90136BC8414CAF4@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> (sfid-20120214_110737_267868_792DF8CE) References: <20120214040120.GA2077@eris.garyseven.net> In-Reply-To: <20120214040120.GA2077@eris.garyseven.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Saul St. John > Sent: dinsdag 14 februari 2012 5:01 > > I don't know if this is correct in the general sense, but the wireless > on my > mid-2010 MacBook Pro doesn't work without it. > > Signed-off-by: Saul St. John Does this patch solve the same issue as [1] with title: [PATCH] bcma: don't fail for bad SPROM CRC Gr. AvS [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg187943.html