Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:34288 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750907Ab2BPMiG (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:38:06 -0500 Subject: Re: calling request_firmware() from module init will not work with recent/future udev versions From: Johannes Berg To: Arend van Spriel Cc: Kay Sievers , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Tom Gundersen , Andy Whitcroft In-Reply-To: <4F3CF0C1.3090304@broadcom.com> References: <1326621743.3448.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> ( sfid-20120115_163411_716244_29DE7A13) <1326704259.3510.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4F3CF0C1.3090304@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:38:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1329395881.3915.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120216_133812_506453_302AD0AE) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 13:04 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 01/16/2012 09:57 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> Now the problem, the pcidev event is blocking in modprobe and waits > >> > for the child event it has generated to finish, but udev does not > >> > start the event because the parent still blocks in modprobe -> > >> > deadlock until default firmware timeout of 60 sec. What we want here, > >> > for several reasons not only udev's dependency logic, is that modprobe > >> > never waits for userspace transactions to finish. > > Ok, thanks for the description. I guess to me that means nothing really > > changes much in the situation I'm thinking of. > > I am working on changes in brcm80211 driver and the behaviour changes > slightly. The async firmware request basically kicks of a kernel thread > to do the actual request. So the probe finishes successfully regardless > what the results will be of the actual firmware request. Hence the > driver is associated with the hardware. This is true. > >> > If userspace is not responding, the firmware request times out after > >> > 60 seconds and the driver is not associated with any hardware. To > >> > retry the firmware loading, the module needs to be unloaded and > >> > reloaded, or the driver needs to be asked to bind to a device again by > >> > writing to the 'bind' in file in the sysfs driver directory. > > Right. > > > > If my previous statement is true, what does it mean regarding retrying > the firmware loading? When the firmware loading fails, the driver should unbind from the device that it failed for, and the retrying behaviour doesn't change (and requires a rebind) johannes