Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:49410 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756598Ab2CYQmJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:42:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:41:25 -0300 From: Gustavo Padovan To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC/CFP -- Linux Wireless (802.11/Bluetooth/NFC) Mini-Summit 2012 (Barcelona?) Message-ID: <20120325164125.GE3106@joana> (sfid-20120325_184216_322963_1AF789A0) References: <20120322192406.GB2432@tuxdriver.com> <1332516578.5884.7.camel@sortiz-mobl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1332516578.5884.7.camel@sortiz-mobl> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi John, * Samuel Ortiz [2012-03-23 16:29:38 +0100]: > Hi John, > > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:24 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > A number of wireless developers reside in Europe, but our last few > > meetings have been held in North America. So, there is a strong desire > > to have a European location for this event. Initial contact with the > > Linux Foundation suggests that we can co-locate this event with the > > LinuxCon Europe event in Barcelona this November. Other suggestions > > are welcome as well, of course. > Barcelona sounds really good to me. I agree with Barcelona too. If you wanna help to coordinate this with Linux Foundation count on me. :) > > > > If we join the LinuxCon Europe event, we would need to decide how to > > fund the event. One option would be to charge a separate entry fee for > > the mini-summit event, seperate from the LinuxCon EU fee. Those that > > do not wish to attend LinuxCon EU may find that attractive. OTOH, > > in the past we have simply said that all the mini-summit attendees > > had to register for the sponsoring event. That has worked reasonably > > well, especially since event speakers would be eligible to attend > > the mini-summit for no fee. I would lean toward keeping that approach. > I agree here as well. +1 to keep that approach, if this summit becomes bigger in the future we can change it. Gustavo