Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:27750 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800Ab2CFFG2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:06:28 -0500 Message-ID: <4F559B4D.5030006@qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20120306_060632_663145_A5F3CE29) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:36:21 +0530 From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Lamparter CC: , , , , , Rajkumar_contact , "Manoharan, Sujith" Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ath9k: use ieee80211_free_txskb References: <4F4F7DC2.8030204@qca.qualcomm.com> <4F54D53D.80300@qca.qualcomm.com> <201203051943.15875.chunkeey@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201203051943.15875.chunkeey@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> would you like me to test this patch, > ? Sure, I would like someone with a AR9300+ to test the patch. > Currently, I'm stuck with a puny AR9287 [in a router]. > So, I can't run tests all day :(. > >> i can just ran a bidirectional traffic test parallel y enabling >> PAPRD,with this proposed patch. > Actually, the changes are all within ath9k's tx error paths. So, > I'm afraid just continuous traffic testing won't do, unless of course > you can churn out all sorts of tx (dma) errors at the same time. yes, i can just a start stress test that can run few days in a noisy channel, with the AR9300 card. > > Regards, > Chr -- thanks, shafi