Return-path: Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:63880 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754377Ab2CTJhW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:37:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20328.16366.166909.255035@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <4F576FD5.2050208@gmail.com> <4F577D9B.7020402@gmail.com> <4F579A88.6030503@openwrt.org> <4F61F551.5010608@gmail.com> <4F639851.5080500@gmail.com> <4F674616.8080103@gmail.com> <4F674FF5.2060406@gmail.com> <4F6751B2.1030809@openwrt.org> <4F681B78.9000207@gmail.com> <4F68235C.5090701@gmail.com> <4F682555.3020502@gmail.com> <20328.16366.166909.255035@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:07:21 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20120320_103742_462418_133C035E) Subject: Re: ath: DMA failed to stop in 10 ms AR_CR=0x00000024 AR_DIAG_SW=0x02000020 DMADBG_7=0x00008040 From: Mohammed Shafi To: Sujith Manoharan Cc: "Justin P. Mattock" , Linux-wireless , Felix Fietkau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Sujith/Justin, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Justin P. Mattock wrote: >> yeah this works: >> >> eading symbols from >> /home/kernel/linux-next/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.o...done. >> (gdb) l *(ath_tx_start+0x284) >> 0xcad4 is in ath_tx_start (drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:1878). >> 1873 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control)) { >> 1874 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?tidno = ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr)[0] & >> 1875 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK; >> 1876 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?tid = ATH_AN_2_TID(txctl->an, tidno); >> 1877 >> 1878 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?WARN_ON(tid->ac->txq != txctl->txq); >> 1879 ? ? ? ? ?} >> 1880 >> 1881 ? ? ? ? ?if ((tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) && tid) { >> 1882 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* >> (gdb) > > Can you try this patch ? just found out that 'ht_supported' may not be set, if assoc response does not has ht_cap IE (or) if we could not parse it (why), then the driver won't initialize those tid related structures ath_tx_node_init, while we later access them in ath_tx_start. so this should fix the issue. > > From: Sujith Manoharan > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:51:26 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] ath9k: Use HW HT capabilites properly > > The commit "ath9k: Remove aggregation flags" changed how > nodes were being initialized. Use the HW HT cap bits > to initialize/de-initialize nodes, else we would be > accessing an uninitialized entry during a suspend/resume cycle, > resulting in a panic. > > Reported-by: Justin P. Mattock > Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan > --- > ?drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | ? ?4 ++-- > ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > index 3879485..215eb25 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static void ath_node_attach(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, > ? ? ? ?an->sta = sta; > ? ? ? ?an->vif = vif; > > - ? ? ? if (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported) { > + ? ? ? if (sc->sc_ah->caps.hw_caps & ATH9K_HW_CAP_HT) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ath_tx_node_init(sc, an); > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?an->maxampdu = 1 << (IEEE80211_HT_MAX_AMPDU_FACTOR + > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sta->ht_cap.ampdu_factor); > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void ath_node_detach(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) > ? ? ? ?an->sta = NULL; > ?#endif > > - ? ? ? if (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported) > + ? ? ? if (sc->sc_ah->caps.hw_caps & ATH9K_HW_CAP_HT) > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ath_tx_node_cleanup(sc, an); > ?} > > -- > 1.7.9.4 > -- thanks, shafi