Return-path: Received: from mms2.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.18]:4185 "EHLO mms2.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756733Ab2CZKKu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:10:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4F70409E.3090203@broadcom.com> (sfid-20120326_121053_921170_1F888486) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:10:38 +0200 From: "Arend van Spriel" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FtYWxlw7Nu?= cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "sgruszka@redhat.com" , "jrnieder@gmail.com" , "Seth Forshee" Subject: Re: brcmsmac still woes, possible regression? References: <4F6D939F.3030206@broadcom.com> <4F7035AD.1080503@broadcom.com> <20120326094331.GA4856@stt008.linux.site> In-Reply-To: <20120326094331.GA4856@stt008.linux.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/26/2012 11:43 AM, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > Based on a user advice, I have set the regulatory domain to ES (Spain) > and I had not experienced another trace since that (the netbook was > running yesterday all day long). It all depends what channels are allowed for the ES domain. However, I am a bit surprised. > Still, I will keep my "three" eyes over it and test any pacth you > consider convenient. Will comment back as soon as I get another trace > or there's something worth to add :-) Thanks. Gr. AvS