Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:41808 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932667Ab2CZRNG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:13:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:13:01 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: Arend van Spriel Cc: =?utf-8?B?Q2FtYWxlw7Nu?= , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "sgruszka@redhat.com" , "jrnieder@gmail.com" Subject: Re: brcmsmac still woes, possible regression? Message-ID: <20120326171301.GC17126@thinkpad-t410> (sfid-20120326_191311_599954_BB08FE51) References: <4F6D939F.3030206@broadcom.com> <4F7035AD.1080503@broadcom.com> <20120326143232.GA17126@thinkpad-t410> <4F709F3E.1090405@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4F709F3E.1090405@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 06:54:22PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > I suspect the warning is caused because mac80211 flush callback is > done after scanning on channels 12 and/or 13. I have a quick fix. > The longer and preferred fix would be to cleanup channel.c and > incorporate your regdom change. I plan to do that in separate > patches. At this point I think the regdom patch I sent is incomplete. We can do a lot better. I'll follow up on the other thread a little later today with my thoughts. Seth