Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:16391 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756303Ab2COIl6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 04:41:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:12:19 +0530 From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan To: Johannes Berg CC: , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Jouni Malinen , Senthil Balasubramanian , Kalle Valo , Jiri Slaby , Nick Kossifidis , Bob Copeland , Bing Zhao , Lennert Buytenhek , Ivo van Doorn , Gertjan van Wingerde , Helmut Schaa , Luciano Coelho , Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.5] cfg80211: enforce lack of interface combinations Message-ID: <20120315084217.GA17590@vasanth-laptop> (sfid-20120315_094207_672121_D1F86C46) References: <20120313150613.300612962@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20120313150613.300612962@sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:06:03PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg > > My grand plan to allow drivers to gradually move over > to advertising virtual interface combinations and only > enforce with drivers that do want it enforced doesn't > seem to be working out, only Christian ever added the > advertising (to carl9170), nobody else did. > > Begin enforcing combinations in cfg80211 so that users > can rely on the information reported about a device. This breaks ath6kl AP mode and P2P, is it expected that the driver needs to register the combination (?) even it supports a single interface? Vasanth