Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:64221 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756888Ab2COI5S (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 04:57:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:27:38 +0530 From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan To: Johannes Berg CC: , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Jouni Malinen , Senthil Balasubramanian , Kalle Valo , Jiri Slaby , Nick Kossifidis , Bob Copeland , Bing Zhao , Lennert Buytenhek , Ivo van Doorn , Gertjan van Wingerde , Helmut Schaa , Luciano Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.5] cfg80211: enforce lack of interface combinations Message-ID: <20120315085736.GB17590@vasanth-laptop> (sfid-20120315_095724_892916_33F9FFC2) References: <20120313150613.300612962@sipsolutions.net> <20120315084217.GA17590@vasanth-laptop> <1331801488.3432.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1331801488.3432.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 14:12 +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:06:03PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > From: Johannes Berg > > > > > > My grand plan to allow drivers to gradually move over > > > to advertising virtual interface combinations and only > > > enforce with drivers that do want it enforced doesn't > > > seem to be working out, only Christian ever added the > > > advertising (to carl9170), nobody else did. > > > > > > Begin enforcing combinations in cfg80211 so that users > > > can rely on the information reported about a device. > > > > This breaks ath6kl AP mode and P2P, is it expected that the driver > > needs to register the combination (?) even it supports a single > > interface? > > Kalle tells me that ath6kl does support multiple virtual interfaces, but > if it didn't then it wouldn't have to register combinations. > > I suspect you're using > driver_param=use_p2p_group_interface=1 > in wpa_supplicant? Actually, I verified only AP mode, since it affects any sort of change interface, I mentioned P2P as well. AP is expected to work without any issue right?. Vasanth