Return-path: Received: from ebb05.tieto.com ([131.207.168.36]:45009 "EHLO ebb05.tieto.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755008Ab2CTOge (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:36:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6895F0.8020109@tieto.com> (sfid-20120320_153640_893599_9D9BF917) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:36:32 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLYXppb3I=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] multi-channel support References: <6c1d5801-97d8-4534-9225-30b493a925b1@FIVLA-EXHUB02.eu.tieto.com> <1332251040.3329.25.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1332251040.3329.25.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the code! I've started to work on this as well, and will take > a look at your code soon. I'm currently a bit sick though so it might be > a couple of days. > >> Work still needs to be done: >> * powersave per-vif >> * queue locking per-vif >> * offchannel rework (hw_config, work_work) >> * and a bit more > > Have you my thoughts at > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/86070 > about the queue issue? Yes, I've read it. I did think about different approaches to handling queues but I decided to do the 'least changes' one for now. I have some patches for a simple splitting of tx pending stuff to per-vif and queue locking function vif variants. I can send them tomorrow once I clean them up. It seems I failed to use msmtp correctly and my emails ended up only at your mailbox. I'll resend them to the mailing list alone. I'm sorry about that. -- Pozdrawiam / Best Regards, Michał Kazior.