Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:60291 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752000Ab2DPQ1P (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:27:15 -0400 Received: by pbcun15 with SMTP id un15so6534550pbc.19 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:27:10 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Felipe Contreras Cc: Stefan Richter , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , linux-wireless Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review Message-ID: <20120416162710.GA24100@kroah.com> (sfid-20120416_182718_452860_39FFF58F) References: <20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com> <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> <20120413105746.10ffb120@stein> <20120413190819.9469.qmail@stuge.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Just one minor correction in this looney email thread: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches > backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was > no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were > generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody > finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed > in v3.3.2. Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the announcemen and the individual patches. kernel.org has the large patch itself if you like that format instead. greg k-h