Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:52131 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S934761Ab2DLWIN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:08:13 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s0yPPqFUO4963MhNb8+c_A=xJi4-eFPJ3s+a1TJ8ZfTtQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120411231102.GA6404@kroah.com> <CAJyhjX2KrfSJW64PJMTHou9zSojsfA1iNT-WahinfMBce_B=BA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120412002927.GA23167@kroah.com> <CAMP44s3Jh-t07A+i82qbAMQyEN0oWTmKk5BJcst942gFdD0=VA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com> <CAMP44s2q+bQE3-zsX4bs=sQDt4jf8eE5bwZ8V88UjodjRyAjog@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> <CAMP44s1T4EVwpzDuV_vV0Zh-5WcPCwdw9eeOfL17Geqp_UFN-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFwKYYgZcBX=L-q_6UdvkvFai+yjzgVxq7cA+HLL-Zojhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMP44s14SQont1wyMeOuWcXUT3U5Tgnoj9mbbgOdVXY_hN0+-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFyLEJsz1yvu4bYe+RHdhLd-XXEScxtAgje=fyuUM+1XxA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMP44s0yPPqFUO4963MhNb8+c_A=xJi4-eFPJ3s+a1TJ8ZfTtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:07:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwaOGbD6S_7So34ZuANG-6fZXZhEah8G0X7McDGhionSg@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20120413_000829_037763_289C986E)
Subject: Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sure, but removing that patch from the stable tree is not going the
> change that information; we already know the patch is wrong.

.. and we wait until it has been fixed in mainline so that we *know*
that information doesn't get lost.

Exactly like any other patch. Exactly like the rules for -stable says we should.

Stop the idiotic arguing already.

              Linus