Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:38528 "EHLO
	mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751728Ab2DBVuV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:50:21 -0400
Received: by ghrr11 with SMTP id r11so1522669ghr.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:50:06 -0500
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?Q2FtYWxlw7Nu?= <noelamac@gmail.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sgruszka@redhat.com" <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: brcmsmac still woes, possible regression?
Message-ID: <20120402215005.GA13969@burratino> (sfid-20120402_235030_686771_311B5512)
References: <4F70409E.3090203@broadcom.com>
 <CAKprTDGdbUnXtbfmck9rtYfKeD71xSXjShW6HnxyZJ8uRZEfnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F717EA1.4060805@broadcom.com>
 <4F72F3D4.50409@broadcom.com>
 <20120328112657.GA6114@stt008.linux.site>
 <4F7302D9.8070009@broadcom.com>
 <CAKprTDHz0d=W1472KcHuD-Zda9dCUX+5nKfEX55UfiNBeQ7T2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F744DD8.8010004@broadcom.com>
 <20120329133835.GA5196@stt008.linux.site>
 <CAKprTDFxqYq7jMm3z19xEt4NBeN9FbcR0pez9BSjY6R8kZC5KA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <CAKprTDFxqYq7jMm3z19xEt4NBeN9FbcR0pez9BSjY6R8kZC5KA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Camaleón wrote:

> Were the patches applied to the mainline?

I doubt it.  Where can one find the patches you were testing, by the
way?

Curious,
Jonathan