MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120415004714.4d729bef@stein>
References: <20120411231102.GA6404@kroah.com>
	<CAMP44s3Jh-t07A+i82qbAMQyEN0oWTmKk5BJcst942gFdD0=VA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com>
	<CAMP44s2q+bQE3-zsX4bs=sQDt4jf8eE5bwZ8V88UjodjRyAjog@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com>
	<CAMP44s1T4EVwpzDuV_vV0Zh-5WcPCwdw9eeOfL17Geqp_UFN-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-VmonhwvnXPKa=LNOR4W0ZTXZqWmzw4UrsKLoE0YN_Bu0FzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMP44s2JPvhEB6Eb049Z_bToAFncHKMEheuyaxyhC=bnh2GJVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120413105746.10ffb120@stein>
	<CAMP44s0RohH9tPiM5qCDT57XBV=iO66PZkSjYVxA6Usg1qJPtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120413154216.476a02ac@stein>
	<CAMP44s10KVwL5pY=Q5hWfyUtU6CvvZZ4Bcg-fEY9dAhSL306aQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120414094137.54a7f213@stein>
	<CAMP44s2Un-M2OCmuRQGpGsHR21gH=S7oJKx4Ci8tvYVCCSitUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120414195559.3d5ab944@stein>
	<CAMP44s0ngzwkbQapTip=oW1b5m2uO5zCzbXHVqHXwT2+Wpgo_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120414232124.1ffd7ac9@stein>
	<CAMP44s05k3YkXSLGdYjJ42d+uEM+bLS9uZ+2ztUBWqcO6kyUtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120415004714.4d729bef@stein>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:56:34 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMP44s1aVEDO7TKrVuXoMXP70qAUX-fT-mZOBU92yfn6h3fEQw@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20120415_005652_234996_C8827A78)
Subject: Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Stefan Richter
<stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> On Apr 15 Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> The question that has not been answered is what makes them different,
>
> It was answered in the grandparent post and in posts before it.

Nope.

>> I'm glad you see it's silly to put bad patches in the stable release
>> just so they get properly tracked for mainline, but that's exactly
>> what you arguing for.
>
> I am not arguing for anything remotely like that.

Please, do explain why that is silly then.

-- 
Felipe Contreras