Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:51:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>,
	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] wireless: at76c50x: allocating too much data
Message-ID: <20120421145140.GU6498@mwanda> (sfid-20120421_164947_166580_5E9988E3)
References: <20120420064705.GE22649@elgon.mountain>
 <CAGRGNgVgtAYknmpB_8Q0OpcUWFjTxBistG+RNs1ORDZeckGsWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120420091449.GI27101@mwanda>
 <87vcku9sob.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
 <20120421124523.GS6498@mwanda>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1204211548090.1987@hadrien>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1204211548090.1987@hadrien>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:51:44PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Looking for x = ... sizeof(x) ... I get 9 reports.  In most cases it
> looks like sizeof(x) is coincidentally the same as the size that is
> wanted.  Two cases that look like they could have some noticible
> effect are:
> 
> arch/xtensa/platforms/iss/network.c, line 789
> drivers/block/cciss.c, line 4211
> 

Clever.  You'd need to restrict it to places where x was a  pointer.
That's better than my check which was specific to kmalloc().  (So
uh...  I'm going to rewrite mine as well to be more generic.  :P)

regards,
dan carpenter