Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:3991 "EHLO MMS3.broadcom.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752879Ab2DCPat convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:30:49 -0400
Message-ID: <4F7B179F.7070502@broadcom.com> (sfid-20120403_173052_657709_53DCD2A4)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:30:39 +0200
From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>
cc: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FtYWxlw7Nu?= <noelamac@gmail.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sgruszka@redhat.com" <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
	"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: brcmsmac still woes, possible regression?
References: <4F70409E.3090203@broadcom.com>
 <CAKprTDGdbUnXtbfmck9rtYfKeD71xSXjShW6HnxyZJ8uRZEfnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F717EA1.4060805@broadcom.com> <4F72F3D4.50409@broadcom.com>
 <20120328112657.GA6114@stt008.linux.site>
 <4F7302D9.8070009@broadcom.com>
 <CAKprTDHz0d=W1472KcHuD-Zda9dCUX+5nKfEX55UfiNBeQ7T2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F744DD8.8010004@broadcom.com>
 <20120329133835.GA5196@stt008.linux.site>
 <CAKprTDFxqYq7jMm3z19xEt4NBeN9FbcR0pez9BSjY6R8kZC5KA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120402215005.GA13969@burratino>
In-Reply-To: <20120402215005.GA13969@burratino>
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8;
 format=flowed
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/02/2012 11:50 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Were the patches applied to the mainline?
>
> I doubt it.  Where can one find the patches you were testing, by the
> way?
>
> Curious,
> Jonathan
>

I sent the patch to Camaleón to test it before sending out the patch. So 
the answer it definitely no. I wanted to get it into rc1, but we missed 
that.

Gr. AvS