Return-path: Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]:38904 "EHLO mout2.freenet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752626Ab2DOSLo (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:11:44 -0400 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SJTvK-0000pg-K8 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:11:42 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:33906 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SJTvK-000581-Dm for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:11:42 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.19] (port=41339 helo=9.mx.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SJTtH-0003aa-AD for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:09:35 +0200 Received: from [2002:4fde:7ca:2:5054:ff:feb8:40bd] (port=34716 helo=mail.maya.org) by 9.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SJTtH-0003Cv-0q for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:09:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4F8B0ED1.5050302@01019freenet.de> (sfid-20120415_201148_052897_0ED30796) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:09:21 +0200 From: Andreas Hartmann MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gertjan van Wingerde CC: Xose Vazquez Perez , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" , "IvDoorn@gmail.com" , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "helmut.schaa@googlemail.com" Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH] wireless: rt2x00: rt2800usb add more devices ids References: <1334448592-16391-1-git-send-email-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> <4F8A6CB6.4080006@01019freenet.de> <4F8A92A5.8090707@gmail.com> <4F8AB8F9.4060503@01019freenet.de> <201C9B63-C214-4D44-B3D0-44948F9DE260@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201C9B63-C214-4D44-B3D0-44948F9DE260@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Gertjan, thank you for your response! Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: [...] > It is impossible to test each and every device that uses a Ralink > chipset. Therefore we run tests on the chipsets only, and simply list > all devices that contain these chipsets. > > Granted, we are having issues with some of the chipsets, but that > should not prevent adding other devices that use the same chipset to > the driver. It would help for making decisions on which brand to buy, if there were a notice in the source code, e.g.: _device successfully tested (802.11abgn)_ - other devices don't get any comment. This way, I would be completely content with the practice to fire in blindly every ID of each existing device containing a Ralink chipset. Kind regards, Andreas