Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:43011 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753409Ab2E1G0z (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2012 02:26:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1338186413.2202.16.camel@joe2Laptop> (sfid-20120528_082658_553419_87C96277) Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: net_ratelimit few aggregation related messages From: Joe Perches To: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan Cc: "John W. Linville" , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 23:26:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4FC3180F.1060902@qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1337960224-7428-1-git-send-email-mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com> <1337976166.30100.6.camel@joe2Laptop> <4FC3180F.1060902@qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 11:45 +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > just today saw this link where you had introduced net_dbg_ratelimited > http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/18978/31017/ > so should i send the v2 patch using net_dbg_ratelimited to net-next > rather than wireless-testing tree ? Yes, but you should wait until net-next opens for patches (after Linus' -rc1 is released)