MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F9FF3D3.1020006@lwfinger.net>
References: <CAKVccoW8GCE=QSC9db6EnoEOsnBkKNoEvqzRrn8orbkf=U66Dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F9BFA14.3070008@lwfinger.net> <CAKVccoWRdcB87DB22=hy9wvEuR7exB7LV8zEGwq1+ug6YK2Zig@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKVccoX-rjdapPE9N4vK6GYGrLVBQmD5yzz79ko4Uv=Uj=K6gA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F9DD22F.8010305@lwfinger.net> <CAKVccoWbiKMPSH-jHHS+L+B-C1+ZZntxdP45ZxuxaN3h3C1iGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F9DE46E.6030103@lwfinger.net> <CAKVccoVU6uMNF0ShZO2jpsJzcf2MhaYzhELimS051TX2hVvyXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKVccoXJxLVm=3v2QnvKq1b3N76eXoNR45GfJ0TzRYx-BuM-fA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F9DFF0A.7080604@lwfinger.net> <20120430120037.GG9863@alittletooquiet.net>
 <CAKVccoU_eWtStR=XJEBuUSQJOTMfXuHuHNxs+xbEwd+mdFiG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F9F55F9.3090800@lwfinger.net> <CAKVccoV+fNYVZUjkNSPzp=T8TC6L_zqUdocp=oYBP0=r-M9HRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F9F6B67.5000400@lwfinger.net> <CAKVccoVA=Rk8AkD+h0n9aeV95h0iMcnQgM_WMJq3rjzoFvkU-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKVccoX=u=qX_OJ8RMSxpNEMGYdGVzimZURJ+ZeNZjhW1jPt6Q@mail.gmail.com> <4F9FF3D3.1020006@lwfinger.net>
From: simple w8 <simplew8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 21:42:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKVccoWJPdPZqoLn6L+_PUKdiM0sLZhCBQCAa2aM7i1xgR21DA@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20120501_224258_910123_65445081)
Subject: Re: rtl8192ce makes keyboard repeat and mouse freeze
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>,
	wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

2012/5/1 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>:
> On 05/01/2012 08:36 AM, simple w8 wrote:
>>
>>
>> SEams that was your last fix for rtl8192
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=commit;h=eb641120479de7ee703fabb5e6ee0ec7947474ba
>> ? that reduced the wifi force, thus detecting less wifi networks.
>>
>> Running without that "fix" the notebook detects more wifi networks,
>> seams like the antenna have more force.
>
>
> You keep talking about "antenna force". What does that mean?
>
> That patch keeps your device from running forever at a maximum of 1 Mbps by
> adjusting the initial gain of the RX amplifier. You may reverse it if you
> want so that you can detect more APs when you scan; however, most people
> prefer to get better performance from the device. That patch will not be
> reversed.

Could you please clarify a litle more about the why and the patch fix?

> As to the problems with power saving, I cannot fix a problem if I cannot
> duplicate it. The locking in that section has been reviewed by several
> people, and there are no glaring errors. If disabling power saving makes
> your box work, then that is what you need to do. That is why those
> parameters can be set at load time.
>
> Larry
>
>