Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:52479 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757747Ab2EaCtf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2012 22:49:35 -0400 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <20422.56339.579488.464864@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20120531_044939_149979_477E189B) Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 08:18:51 +0530 To: Ben Greear CC: "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Ath9k performance testing results (AR9380) In-Reply-To: <4FC55443.4020003@candelatech.com> References: <4FC55443.4020003@candelatech.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ben Greear wrote: > I am not sure why there is such a big difference, but possibly > sending wifi is harder than receiving it, and the Atom processor > just can't keep up. I have a small Atom-based netbook, I'll try with it and see what numbers can be seen. It's a pain to pry it open and bolt a different card, though. :) Sujith