Return-path: Received: from kvm.w1.fi ([128.177.28.162]:44409 "EHLO jmaline2.user.openhosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756944Ab2EGPTN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 11:19:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:18:58 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen To: Andreas Hartmann Cc: hostap@lists.shmoo.com, "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [rt2800pci (AP) - ath9k] 802.11w: broken aggregation handling? Message-ID: <20120507151858.GA20891@w1.fi> (sfid-20120507_171916_578787_C82A42B7) References: <4FA75983.9040003@01019freenet.de> <201205070702.q4772uem002960@mail.maya.org> <20120507135917.GB19222@w1.fi> <4FA7D932.1020803@01019freenet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4FA7D932.1020803@01019freenet.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:16:18PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Jouni Malinen wrote: > > I don't think that hostapd would verify driver capabilities for 802.11w > > at the moment, so it does not know that it should have rejected the > > configuration here.. Same for wpa_supplicant and station mode, I'd > > guess. > > Wouldn't it be better, if it would stop processing completely? I was > surprised to have a half working connection :-). Sure, it would be good to verify driver capabilities before even starting the BSS as AP or trying to associate with 802.11w as station. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA