Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:42639 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752484Ab2EHK52 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 06:57:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1336474641.4320.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120508_125731_723448_1DBC7673) Subject: Re: Wireless problem in 3.4-rc5 From: Johannes Berg To: Eliad Peller Cc: Larry Finger , John Linville , wireless Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 12:57:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20120508_110047_096982_8A84E6AC) References: <4FA0405C.8050101@lwfinger.net> <4FA19674.90804@lwfinger.net> <1336390235.4325.16.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120508_110047_096982_8A84E6AC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 12:00 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Eliad Peller wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >>> > i'm not sure this is related to the problem you're facing, but the > >>> > commit above seems to have some bug in which a packet might get > >>> > enqueued on invalid queue (0xff) - please try this patch (compile > >>> > tested only): > >> > >> Eliad, can you submit that patch with more details? > >> > > sure, i'll send it soon. > > > i've just figured it that it doesn't seem to have any effect, as the > hw_queue will get overridden anyway in ieee80211_tx (because > IEEE80211_HW_QUEUE_CONTROL is not set), so i'm not sure it's really > needed. do you want me to send it anyway? Still seems cleaner to me, I think johannes