Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:62133 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314Ab2E0CYH (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2012 22:24:07 -0400 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <20417.36878.491297.428459@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20120527_042441_674763_9FDB45B7) Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 07:53:10 +0530 To: Ben Greear CC: Sujith Manoharan , Adrian Chadd , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? In-Reply-To: <4FC18E6E.4020707@candelatech.com> References: <4FC04B5A.1070900@candelatech.com> <20417.35821.91808.2702@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20417.36056.95300.690329@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <4FC18E6E.4020707@candelatech.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ben Greear wrote: > On 05/26/2012 07:09 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > > Sujith Manoharan wrote: > >> Odd. I get low numbers with a DB120 running OpenWRT (git HEAD). > >> > >> TCP TX - ~260 Mbps. > >> TCP RX - ~160 Mbps. > >> > >> UDP RX - ~240 Mbps. > >> UDP TX - iperf borks and doesn't display anything. > > Maybe NAT won't let it through, if this is coming downstream? Ah yes, OpenWRT has default iptables rules - I'll check. > For that matter, from what perspective is the TX or RX? I was using the ath9k station as the test unit, so: STA->AP is TX. AP->STA is RX. Sujith