MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4FC2437C.9090106@candelatech.com>
References: <4FC04B5A.1070900@candelatech.com>
	<20416.19680.571601.549629@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<4FC0F8CE.1030303@candelatech.com>
	<20417.972.888113.821079@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<20417.1857.115550.807746@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<4FC2437C.9090106@candelatech.com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 10:40:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmon13Q5icGU0oeQWaOaHF+jfhEZHyK2Y1xp5BwCgM_74pg@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20120527_194100_398159_A671F260)
Subject: Re: Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 27 May 2012 08:08, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:

> Do you have a link to anyone selling this AP, or is it just an
> engineering sample as well?

The board is an engineering sample but (a) customers and developers
can ask for them under NDA, (b) yes, openwrt developers have done this
and have the hardware, and (c) the chip is shipping as far as I'm
aware.

It's "just" a MIPS74k + AR9340 (3x3) + on-board AR9580 I think. I'll
have to double check. The wireless NIC side of things is pretty
standard though, so any Osprey NIC will be fine.

> I can't even find marketing type pages for AR9340, search results come up
> empty at www.atheros.com :P
>> [ ?3] 33.0-34.0 sec ?39.0 MBytes ? 327 Mbits/sec ? 0.253 ms ? 13/ 5002
>> (0.26%)

> Those are nice results! ?I'll try WPEA-127N as AP and STA and see what I
> get.

That's what you should be getting. I'd be really surprised if you didn't. :-)

nbd has said he'll look into it, so between Sujith and Felix I think
we're well covered for now.

Thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention Ben!


Adrian