Message-ID: <4F9FD376.5060400@broadcom.com> (sfid-20120501_141434_568466_C2ABE686)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 14:13:42 +0200
From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support
References: <1334607462-5387-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com>
 <4F9067F6.90001@broadcom.com> <20120430171210.GB20105@thinkpad-t410>
In-Reply-To: <20120430171210.GB20105@thinkpad-t410>
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=iso-8859-1;
 format=flowed
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 04/30/2012 07:12 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:31:02PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 04/16/2012 10:17 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
>>> Hi Arnd,
>>>
>>> Here's the latest update to the brcmsmac regulatory rework that I've
>>> been working on. I've broken it up into a series of smaller patches,
>>> cleaned things up, and finished what changes I can with the information
>>> available to me.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Seth,
>>
>> Just to indicate what we are doing with regard to your patches. I
>> organized a review internally for these patches. Waiting for one
>> more to sent back comments. Just pinged him today. So end of this
>> week I can probably sent you the collected comments.
>
> Hi Arend,
>
> Any feedback yet from your internal review/testing?
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
>

Hi Seth,

I was about to respond to each patch with collected comments. However, 
one of the comments mentioned I should involve compliance staff on these 
changes so I have to explain the general ideas behind your patches to 
them. Sorry for the delay.

Gr. AvS