Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:50541 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753181Ab2EHGe3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 02:34:29 -0400 Message-ID: <1336458864.4328.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120508_083432_871955_CF239592) Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [rt2800pci (AP) - ath9k] 802.11w: broken aggregation handling? From: Johannes Berg To: Andreas Hartmann Cc: Helmut Schaa , Jouni Malinen , hostap@lists.shmoo.com, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 08:34:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4FA8BD11.3080703@01019freenet.de> References: <4FA75983.9040003@01019freenet.de> <201205070702.q4772uem002960@mail.maya.org> <4FA7A13D.6020405@01019freenet.de> <20120507135533.GA19222@w1.fi> <4FA8BD11.3080703@01019freenet.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 08:28 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > This means for rt2x00: to get 11w working with hw encryption enabled, > there needs to be some differentiation for the encryption of management > frames: if management frame, let mac80211 do the job - all other frames > should be encrypted by hw. > Correct? That might not be sufficient -- you might have control over TX, but if the hardware attempts to decrypt encrypted mgmt frames you're out of luck entirely. johannes