Return-path: Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:64105 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754998Ab2EJUDy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 16:03:54 -0400 Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so1928370vbb.19 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:03:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120510130711.GA15533@shaftnet.org> References: <4FA15A70.2020108@stericsson.com> <20120509203730.GE17416@shaftnet.org> <20120510130711.GA15533@shaftnet.org> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:03:53 -0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20120510_220358_685876_D4C751FC) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/21] cw1200: ST-Ericsson cw1200 wlan device driver From: Kevin Groeneveld To: Solomon Peachy Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin , Dmitry Tarnyagin , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Solomon, > I don't believe it will cause any problems, as the bluetooth pins aren't > hooked up on the SG901-1091 module. ?That said, the PTA record on the > current Sagrad SDD files for the 1091/1098 modules specifies that BT > coexistence is disabled (ePTA mode = 0), so it should be functionally > equivalent to no PTA record being present. It is good to know the Sagrad SDD file is disabling PTA in the hardware even though there is a PTA record present. Although, at least with the driver Dmitry posted on this mailing list, the driver is taking action simply on the presence of the PTA record. I can easily disable this for my testing. I wonder if the parsing of the SDD file in the driver could be a little smarter to detect that the PTA record is actually disabling PTA and not assume the existence of a PTA record means PTA is being used. Kevin