Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:49274 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331Ab2EaJKD (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 05:10:03 -0400 Message-ID: <1338455399.7328.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120531_111040_962193_C2F998A4) Subject: Re: Master mode support in iwlagn? From: Johannes Berg To: Erwin Van de Velde Cc: linux-wireless , Dan Williams Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 11:09:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3093264.LxkCudZSCQ@sylvesterjr.cmi.ua.ac.be> (sfid-20120531_110420_574883_2E884A12) References: <5252852.vpKViOerhF@sylvesterjr.cmi.ua.ac.be> <1338417129.8887.32.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> <1338450022.4531.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <3093264.LxkCudZSCQ@sylvesterjr.cmi.ua.ac.be> (sfid-20120531_110420_574883_2E884A12) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Please don't top-post. On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:03 +0200, Erwin Van de Velde wrote: > What is the reasoning behind it? Why provide it for some wireless NICs and not > for others? Seems quite odd for me and features like Internet sharing over > wireless are not that exotic, are they? This features requires extensive testing, space in the firmware that not all devices have, integration, etc. It's not trivial to port to different devices. johannes