Return-path: Received: from kvm.w1.fi ([128.177.28.162]:44351 "EHLO jmaline2.user.openhosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756571Ab2EGN73 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 09:59:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:59:17 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen To: Andreas Hartmann Cc: hostap@lists.shmoo.com, "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [rt2800pci (AP) - ath9k] 802.11w: broken aggregation handling? Message-ID: <20120507135917.GB19222@w1.fi> (sfid-20120507_155932_768233_6A1EFD9F) References: <4FA75983.9040003@01019freenet.de> <201205070702.q4772uem002960@mail.maya.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <201205070702.q4772uem002960@mail.maya.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:02:58AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > - Why is the authentication started here at all, regardless of an error? I don't think that hostapd would verify driver capabilities for 802.11w at the moment, so it does not know that it should have rejected the configuration here.. Same for wpa_supplicant and station mode, I'd guess. > - Why does TLS succeed? (802.11g is "working"). If you are using SHA-1 -based AKM, the initial association, 4-way handshake, and data TX/RX are almost identical.. > - Why does set_key fail? The driver did not support configuration of IGTK for BIP (i.e., key to protect group-addressed robust management frames). -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA