Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:64995 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932258Ab2ENVma convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 17:42:30 -0400 Received: by bkcji2 with SMTP id ji2so4248646bkc.19 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:42:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4FB1735D.2000902@lwfinger.net> References: <4FB15D76.9000302@lwfinger.net> <4FB1735D.2000902@lwfinger.net> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:42:29 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20120514_234234_123453_BDD24536) Subject: Re: Warning from wireless-testing for ipw2100 From: Stanislav Yakovlev To: Larry Finger Cc: wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 14 May 2012 14:04, Larry Finger wrote: > On 05/14/2012 03:53 PM, Stanislav Yakovlev wrote: >> >> Hello Larry, >> >> On 14 May 2012 12:31, Larry Finger ?wrote: >>> >>> A freshly pulled copy of wireless-testing 3.4-rc7 has the following >>> warning >>> that the 802.11 band has not been set when the ipw2100 driver is probed: >>> [ ? 17.766431] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> [ ? 17.766467] WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:562 >>> wiphy_register+0x34c/0x3c0 [cfg80211]() >> >> >> I think it is the same problem as for ipw2200 as found by Stefan >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132720334512946&w=2 >> >> which is already fixed. >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=133457257407196&w=2 >> >>> .... >>> I do not use the device and it doesn't make any difference to me, but >>> there >>> may be someone that needs it. >> >> >> I will send a patch. > > > If you mean the patch in the second URL above, it has already been applied > to my source. There were two almost identical changes: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132720195012653&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132720204412667&w=2 First one broke ipw2200, and the second one broke ipw2100. The patch I mentioned fixes ipw2200 and does not fix ipw2100. Stanislav.