Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:38384 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755359Ab2ENJXQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 05:23:16 -0400 Received: by bkcji2 with SMTP id ji2so3586381bkc.19 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 02:23:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1336658913-11396-1-git-send-email-victorg@ti.com> From: Arik Nemtsov Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:15:22 +0300 Message-ID: (sfid-20120514_112319_770637_DA75DF9E) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wl12xx: fix fm_coex parameters configuration To: "Goldenshtein, Victor" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, coelho@ti.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Goldenshtein, Victor wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Arik Nemtsov wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Victor Goldenshtein >> wrote: >> > Wrong fm_coex parameters were set during wl12xx >> > init phase, fix it. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ziv Riesel >> > Signed-off-by: Victor Goldenshtein >> > --- >> > >> > v2: changed the subject wlcore -> wl12xx >> >> Are you sure this is not relevant for 18xx? Are the parameters there >> correct? >> > > You're right, I will send a patch also for the 18xx. But I"m not sure > which?branch?should I use ? To send also to Linux-Wireless ? > Is the remotes/origin/18xx_upstream branch is good for upstream ? Better send it rebased on the internal branch. I'll send it to linux wireless later (together with other pending patches). Arik