Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:62404 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755699Ab2EITBb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 15:01:31 -0400 Received: by eaaq12 with SMTP id q12so248614eaa.19 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT) References: <1336361682-2771-1-git-send-email-zero.lin.0203@gmail.com> <599E416D1C5C994980C45977191D726906AB2FE230@MTKMBS03.mediatek.inc> <20120509183304.409ace0e@destiny.ordissimo> In-Reply-To: <20120509183304.409ace0e@destiny.ordissimo> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <424677BB-489B-4F60-B64E-9F5FE432B27E@gmail.com> (sfid-20120509_210134_938337_639BDDCE) Cc: =?utf-8?Q? "Zero_Lin_=28=E6=9E=97=E7=91=9E=E9=9D=92=29" ?= , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" From: Gertjan van Wingerde Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH] rt2x00:Add RT539B chipset support V2 Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 21:01:24 +0200 To: Anisse Astier Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 9 mei 2012, at 18:33, Anisse Astier wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2012 21:18:50 +0800, Zero Lin (林瑞青) wrote : > >> Dear Gertjan, >> >> I am sorry, what should I do now? >> Re-send a patch? > > I think what Gertjan meant is that you should resend the first version of > you patch with the 0x539b in the correct position. > > The problem with the V2 of your patch was that it was on top of your first > version, therefore not usable separately. That is exactly what I meant. And sorry for not responding earlier. I'm just very busy at the moment with very little time for my linux related hobby :-( >> >> BR, >> Zero >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gertjan van Wingerde [mailto:gwingerde@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 8:40 PM >> To: Zero Lin >> Cc: users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; John Linville; Zero Lin (林瑞青) >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00:Add RT539B chipset support V2 >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Zero Lin wrote: >>> From: "Zero.Lin" >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zero.Lin >> >> I'm sorry, but you will have to do this as a complete new patch replacing your old one, not as an incremental to your initial patch. > > Regards, > > Anisse