Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:46778 "EHLO
	youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757694Ab2EAQMr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 1 May 2012 12:12:47 -0400
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 11:12:43 -0500
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support
Message-ID: <20120501161243.GC9500@thinkpad-t410> (sfid-20120501_181251_226261_DB86BC9D)
References: <1334607462-5387-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com>
 <4F9067F6.90001@broadcom.com>
 <20120430171210.GB20105@thinkpad-t410>
 <4F9FD376.5060400@broadcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <4F9FD376.5060400@broadcom.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 02:13:42PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> I was about to respond to each patch with collected comments.
> However, one of the comments mentioned I should involve compliance
> staff on these changes so I have to explain the general ideas behind
> your patches to them. Sorry for the delay.

Thanks for the update. Let me know if I can be of any help.

Seth