Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:38889 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753530Ab2ECU1r (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 16:27:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tcp: cleanup tcp_try_coalesce From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" To: "John W. Linville" Cc: David Miller , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell In-Reply-To: <20120503170727.GM9285@tuxdriver.com> References: <1336017985.12425.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA21087.1080801@gmail.com> <1336022373.12425.24.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120503.012502.44731688706812861.davem@davemloft.net> <20120503151418.GJ9285@tuxdriver.com> <1336058659.27487.80.camel@wwguy-huron> <20120503170727.GM9285@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 13:21:12 -0700 Message-ID: <1336076472.27487.82.camel@wwguy-huron> (sfid-20120503_222752_365807_FE438227) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi John, On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:07 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:24:19AM -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 11:14 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:25:02AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > > > > From: Eric Dumazet > > > > Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 07:19:33 +0200 > > > > > > > > > My last patch against iwlwifi is still waiting to make its way into > > > > > official tree. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg192629.html > > > > > > > > John, please rectify this situation. > > > > > > > > The Intel Wireless folks said they would test it, but that was more > > > > than a month ago. > > > > > > > > It's not acceptable to let bug fixes rot for that long, I don't care > > > > what their special internal testing procedure is. > > > > > > > > If they give you further pushback, please just ignore them and apply > > > > Eric's fix directly. > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > I imagine that this somehow got lost in the shuffle during the > > > merge window. That doesn't excuse it, of course. > > > > > > It has waited long enough already, so I'll just go ahead and take it. > > > > > it is my mistake to lost this patch during the iwlwifi re-factor work, > > the patch is no longer apply and I ask Eric to rebase the patch. > > > > Sorry again for the mistake > > Well, it seems like a fix needed for 3.4. And, the patch applies there. > > It does cause some merge breakage in wireless-testing (and presumably > in linux-next). I'll attach the commit diff for the wireless-testing > merge fixup I did, for review and/or as a peace offering to sfr... :-) > > Please take a look at the result in wireless-testing and let me know > if it is broken...thanks! > Looks good to me, thanks very much for helping this. Wey >