Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:37464 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834Ab2EHJAP (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 05:00:15 -0400 Received: by obbtb18 with SMTP id tb18so9513620obb.19 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 02:00:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4FA0405C.8050101@lwfinger.net> <4FA19674.90804@lwfinger.net> <1336390235.4325.16.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 12:00:15 +0300 Message-ID: (sfid-20120508_110021_571634_304C9FAA) Subject: Re: Wireless problem in 3.4-rc5 From: Eliad Peller To: Johannes Berg Cc: Larry Finger , John Linville , wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Eliad Peller wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> > i'm not sure this is related to the problem you're facing, but the >>> > commit above seems to have some bug in which a packet might get >>> > enqueued on invalid queue (0xff) - please try this patch (compile >>> > tested only): >> >> Eliad, can you submit that patch with more details? >> > sure, i'll send it soon. > i've just figured it that it doesn't seem to have any effect, as the hw_queue will get overridden anyway in ieee80211_tx (because IEEE80211_HW_QUEUE_CONTROL is not set), so i'm not sure it's really needed. do you want me to send it anyway? Eliad.