Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:41751 "EHLO
	mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757388Ab2EVKmZ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 May 2012 06:42:25 -0400
Received: by eeit10 with SMTP id t10so1661214eei.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FBB6D8D.4010106@googlemail.com> (sfid-20120522_124229_189071_AFB2C2F4)
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:42:21 +0100
From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Zintakis <michael.zintakis@googlemail.com>
CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IEEE 802.11w support/compliance in TI-1251 (wl1251)
References: <4FBAD772.2090807@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FBAD772.2090807@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>


> Thanks in advance for any help!
Hehe, another one...

Someone from TI will be along shortly to let you know that <insert name 
of random TI engineer/developer> is having mental breakdown/couldn't be 
arsed replying (delete as appropriate) and to also thank you for your 
patience! You are more likely to get a response from Bill Gates on a 
Linux support question than have somebody from TI deal with your 
particular query.

FWIW, I don't think MFP is supported in Wilink, maybe it is on wl1251 
(the linux-wireless driver), but I couldn't manage to get that driver to 
work on Android. I also had the driver supplied by TI and wanted to 
replace it for different reasons - if you look at the archives of this 
ML you may find why that is. I ended up completely replacing my device 
which doesn't have anything related to Texas Instruments (at least not 
in terms of wireless anyway) and I am much happier that way - staying as 
far as possible from having to deal with a bunch of lazy, uninterested 
and self-indulgent "developers" from that company is not anything I'd 
recommend to anyone.

In any case, I am hoping your experience is a bit different and wish you 
good luck!