Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:54654 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757813Ab2ENVEe (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 17:04:34 -0400 Received: by yenm10 with SMTP id m10so4708160yen.19 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB1735D.2000902@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20120514_230439_103510_5B51517E) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:04:29 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Yakovlev CC: wireless Subject: Re: Warning from wireless-testing for ipw2100 References: <4FB15D76.9000302@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/14/2012 03:53 PM, Stanislav Yakovlev wrote: > Hello Larry, > > On 14 May 2012 12:31, Larry Finger wrote: >> A freshly pulled copy of wireless-testing 3.4-rc7 has the following warning >> that the 802.11 band has not been set when the ipw2100 driver is probed: >> [ 17.766431] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 17.766467] WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:562 >> wiphy_register+0x34c/0x3c0 [cfg80211]() > > I think it is the same problem as for ipw2200 as found by Stefan > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132720334512946&w=2 > > which is already fixed. > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=133457257407196&w=2 > >> .... >> I do not use the device and it doesn't make any difference to me, but there >> may be someone that needs it. > > I will send a patch. If you mean the patch in the second URL above, it has already been applied to my source. Larry