Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:38637 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750948Ab2EXGgs (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2012 02:36:48 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Arik Nemtsov Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow setting default U-APSD queues/max_sp_len for STA References: <1337760813-27055-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <87wr436utp.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <87mx4z6u4n.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <87ipfn6koz.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <87ehqa6u2d.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:36:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Arik Nemtsov's message of "Thu, 24 May 2012 08:32:14 +0300") Message-ID: <87aa0y6q69.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20120524_083651_751109_85B355F2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Arik Nemtsov writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> But this was a workaround for an IOP problem with certain APs, right? >> How is firmware going to be smart in that case? >> >> It would help to see what you are exactly planning to do on wl12xx with >> this interface. Currently I'm just guessing what your plans really are. > > The plan is to enable only VO as U-APSD (as I wrote in a previous > email). You mean you will hardcode it in wl12xx and with all APs only VO has U-APSD enabled? > We've had problems with some APs (can't remember the models) that > assume non-VO ACs always use legacy PS. This would lead to problems - > our driver would never wake up. In that sense the problem is general. Yeah, that looks like a general problem but of course it's difficult to make any conclusions with this little data. -- Kalle Valo