Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:36923 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314Ab2E0CQ0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2012 22:16:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC18E6E.4020707@candelatech.com> (sfid-20120527_041649_544907_5D5C41D0) Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 19:16:14 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sujith Manoharan CC: Adrian Chadd , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? References: <4FC04B5A.1070900@candelatech.com> <20417.35821.91808.2702@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20417.36056.95300.690329@gargle.gargle.HOWL> In-Reply-To: <20417.36056.95300.690329@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/26/2012 07:09 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Sujith Manoharan wrote: >> Odd. I get low numbers with a DB120 running OpenWRT (git HEAD). >> >> TCP TX - ~260 Mbps. >> TCP RX - ~160 Mbps. >> >> UDP RX - ~240 Mbps. >> UDP TX - iperf borks and doesn't display anything. Maybe NAT won't let it through, if this is coming downstream? For that matter, from what perspective is the TX or RX? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com