Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36858 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951Ab2FRPi6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:38:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:38:52 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Gertjan van Wingerde Cc: Xose Vazquez Perez , users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH] wireless: rt2x00: rt2800: remove unsupported rf and chips Message-ID: <20120618153852.GA3965@redhat.com> (sfid-20120618_173900_838749_8D892F79) References: <1339882592-17680-1-git-send-email-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:01:54AM +0200, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: > Hi Xose, > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez > wrote: > > removed, no support for: > > > > RF2853 2.4G/5G 3T3R > > RF3322 2.4G 2T2R(RT3352/RT3371/RT3372/RT3391/RT3392) > > RF3053 2.4G/5G 3T3R(RT3883/RT3563/RT3573/RT3593/RT3662) > > > > RT3593 > > RT3883 > > > > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez > > I don't mind removing the RT chipset definitions, but I would like to > retain the RF chipset definitions. Even > though these definitions are not used in the code, the do represent > values we could see from devices, so > I consider the list to be documentation as well. Perhaps we can comment them out, as compromise :-) Stanislaw