Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:62891 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751918Ab2FWGMR (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2012 02:12:17 -0400 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <20453.24023.191664.676844@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20120623_081236_126568_C43960F7) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:40:31 +0530 To: "John W. Linville" CC: Sujith Manoharan , David Miller , , , Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2012-06-22 In-Reply-To: <20120623041103.GA29801@tuxdriver.com> References: <20120622201716.GB13918@tuxdriver.com> <20452.64701.760819.559191@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20453.302.671438.533390@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20120622.165611.2220193371527786713.davem@davemloft.net> <20453.9687.225096.194368@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20120623041103.GA29801@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: John W. Linville wrote: > > The patch was under review: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=134001371002288&w=2 > > Quibbling over the exact number of iterations for a timeout didn't > seem is important as avoiding an endless loop... Yes, which is why I okayed the patch. :) Sujith