Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:43511 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755344Ab2FOQKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:10:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4FDB5E52.1020608@qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20120615_181010_923131_5919712F) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:09:54 +0300 From: Kalle Valo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arend van Spriel CC: Johannes Berg , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , , , Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] wireless: add CONFIG_CFG80211_EXPERT References: <1339203070-17979-1-git-send-email-rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com> <1339228530.4539.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD3A936.8070600@broadcom.com> <1339399952.4520.13.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD60369.80108@qca.qualcomm.com> <1339425944.4520.27.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20120614193104.GD32257@tux> <1339748211.4512.6.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FDAF096.200@qca.qualcomm.com> <4FDB1740.60707@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <4FDB1740.60707@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/15/2012 02:06 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 06/15/2012 10:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> On 06/15/2012 11:16 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>>> As for a name, I thought about it for a while and given that we have different >>>>> "wireless" technologies -- bluetooth, NFC, naming this CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXPERT >>>>> seemed odd, and given that our 802.11 framework is under cfg80211 naming it >>>>> CONFIG_CFG80211_EXPERT seemed appropriate. But even if its under cfg80211 >>>>> perhaps something more explicit about the implications may be better, how >>>>> about CONFIG_CFG80211_MAY_BREAK_CERTIFICATION ? >>> >>> Or you could just be explicit about it and call it >>> CONFIG_WIRELESS_REGULATORY_BREAKAGE or something like that :-) >> >> CONFIG_WIRELESS_CERTIFIED? > > That one looks familiar ;-) Sorry, did you suggest that already? I missed that. I guess I need to start organising my email better :) Kalle