Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:38195 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933251Ab2FHTm1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:42:27 -0400 Received: by qadb17 with SMTP id b17so875156qad.19 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:42:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4FD25487.7050002@lwfinger.net> References: <1339168452.5748.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339168600.5748.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD21C6B.5000402@lwfinger.net> <1339170182.5748.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170287.5748.8.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170510.5748.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170742.5748.10.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339171159.5748.11.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD22727.7000500@lwfinger.net> <1339172904.5748.18.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20120608183339.78a7fcbd@milhouse> <4FD239AA.9090708@lwfinger.net> <20120608201053.48548a11@milhouse> <4FD24332.3010202@lwfinger.net> <20120608203131.01dce8e3@milhouse> <4FD25487.7050002@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 21:42:25 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20120608_214230_486876_AF1A05F9) Subject: Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues)) From: Andre Heider To: Larry Finger Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_B=FCsch?= , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Larry Finger wrote: > On 06/08/2012 01:31 PM, Michael B?sch wrote: >> >> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:23:46 -0500 >> Larry Finger wrote: >> >>> On 06/08/2012 01:10 PM, Michael B?sch wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:43:06 -0500 >>>> Larry Finger wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 06/08/2012 11:33 AM, Michael B?sch wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Larry, did you check with PIO? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, I only used DMA. With the latest patch, compilation is Ok, and DMA >>>>> works for >>>>> both kinds of firmware, while PIO fails for both. >>>> >>>> >>>> Does PIO even work without that patch and with prop-firmware? >>> >>> >>> No. That seems to be a different bug. >> >> >> That's nice. Could you probably bisect it? It used to work at some point. >> >> PS: >> I'm sorry that I'm not of much help these days, because I currently >> don't have a working b43 device around :) > > > No problem. Most of the time when I'm running b43, it is on one of my older > test machines. > > I need to do a little more testing before I start a bisection of the PIO > problem. My PPC Mac fails with kernel 2.6.32, which is as old as I have > available. At the moment, I don't have the time to fire up an old i586 > notebook to see if we have a PIO problem, or an endian issue with PIO; > however, I think Andre's wii is big endian. Yeah, it's a 32bit powerpc. >From my initial report: The hw queues fail the check in ieee80211_check_queues(). When I hack that function to always "return 0;" wlan works again. Apart from the patch test runs that's what I'm running atm, so I'm pretty sure you can assume its not a BE issue. Regards, Andre