Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:45755 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751254Ab2F1Lpr (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:45:47 -0400 Message-ID: <1340883944.4491.43.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120628_134551_290382_EA7D38BE) Subject: Re: [PATCH] respect channels in iface combinations From: Johannes Berg To: Michal Kazior Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:45:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4FEC42D9.5040605@tieto.com> References: <1340878025-2695-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <1340879319.4491.38.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FEC3BEC.2070906@tieto.com> <1340882283.4491.42.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FEC42D9.5040605@tieto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 13:41 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > >> This is strange. I did develop it with the start_ap patches (my base is > >> master-2012-06-14 on wireless-next). I may be missing a few from your > >> mac80211 repo though. > > > > Yeah I thought you had. I know what happened - you don't have the "pass > > channel" patches. Could you check & rebase? > > Yeah. The conflict on preset_chan is because I'm missing Felix's patch > ,,cfg80211: fix regression in multi-vif AP start''. > > On the other hand I've had a conflict on my ,,cfg80211: respect iface > combinations when starting operation'' while rebasing to mac80211-next. > mac80211-next is missing my earlier patch ,,cfg80211: check iface > combinations only when iface is running'' which is already in wireless-next. Ah, that's because that patch went through mac80211.git. I'll merge wireless-next.git into mac80211-next.git to give you a better base. johannes