Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog115.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.238]:36206 "EHLO na3sys009aog115.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754218Ab2FMTEl (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:04:41 -0400 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so927439lah.18 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1339614276.10534.64.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> (sfid-20120613_210443_881798_7663E9B9) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wlcore: send EAPOLs with basic rate policy From: Luciano Coelho To: Eyal Shapira Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:04:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1339493995-17944-1-git-send-email-eyal@wizery.com> References: <1339493995-17944-1-git-send-email-eyal@wizery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 12:39 +0300, Eyal Shapira wrote: > EAPOLs are sent at high rates as they are considered > data packets. Some APs like Motorola Symbol AP7131 and AP650 > don't respond well to these rates and don't respond with > EAPOL 3/4 consistently. When sending EAPOL 2/4 at 54Mbps > we've seen approx 30% success rate in getting EAPOL 3/4 response > while using 11Mbps we got 100% success. > To increase the chances of successful 4-Way handshake with > such APs, send EAPOLs with basic rate policy in order to avoid > high rates. > > Signed-off-by: Eyal Shapira > --- > v2: added info about the APs and problem (Thanks Johannes!) > Aside from that I'll send a separate patch for mac80211 so non HW rate > control drivers will do the same. Applied, thanks! -- Luca.